4.5 Article

Efficacy and safety of currently marketed anti-osteoporosis medications

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2014.09.003

Keywords

osteoporosis; treatment; efficacy; safety

Funding

  1. Servier
  2. Novartis
  3. Negma
  4. Lilly
  5. Wyeth
  6. Amgen
  7. GlaxoSmithKline
  8. Roche
  9. Merckle
  10. Nycomed-Takeda
  11. NPS
  12. IBSA-Genevrier
  13. Theramex
  14. UCB
  15. Asahi Kasei
  16. Endocyte
  17. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  18. Rottapharm
  19. IBSA
  20. Genevrier
  21. Teijin
  22. Teva
  23. Analis
  24. Nycomed
  25. NovoNordisk
  26. Ebewee Pharma
  27. Zodiac
  28. Danone
  29. Will Pharma
  30. Bristol Myers Squibb
  31. Merck Sharp Dohme
  32. Pfizer
  33. Organon
  34. Therabel
  35. Boehringer
  36. Chiltern
  37. Galapagos
  38. Bayer
  39. SMB
  40. Nutraveris

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the past 2 decades, many interventions were proven effective in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The objective of an anti-osteoporosis treatment is to reduce fracture rates, ideally at all skeletal sites (i.e. spine, hip, and other non-spine). The armamentarium against osteoporosis includes anti-resorptive agents (i.e. bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators and denosumab), bone-forming agents (i.e. peptides from the parathyroid hormone family) and one agent with a dual mechanism of action (i.e. strontium ranelate). All these medications combine antifracture efficacy with a reasonable benefit/risk profile. However, the choice of a particular chemical entity, in one individual patient is based on the knowledge and expertise of the physician. Prioritization of drugs should be based on the individual profile of the patient, the severity of osteoporosis and the specific contraindications, warnings and precautions of use of the various available medications. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available