4.4 Article

HIV-1 subtypes and the HIV epidemics in four cities in sub-Saharan Africa

Journal

AIDS
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages S109-S116

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200108004-00012

Keywords

Africa; HIV-1 subtypes; heterosexual transmission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe the distribution of HIV-1 subtypes in two cities with high HIV prevalence (Kisumu, Kenya and Ndola, Zambia) and two with relatively low prevalence (Cotonou, Benin and Yaounde, Cameroon), and to examine whether the differences in prevalence of HIV infection could be due to the predominance within the infected populations of subtypes with differing efficiency of heterosexual transmission. Methods: For around 100 randomly selected HIV-positive sera from the general population and 60 from sex workers in each city, the HIV-1 subtype was determined in the env fragment. For between 19 and 52 of the sera from the general population and 20-32 sera from sex workers, the subtype was also determined in the gag fragment. Results: Over 70% of infections in Cotonou, Yaounde and Kisumu were with subtype A (by env). However, around one-half of subtype A infections in Cotonou and Yaounde were found to be the circulating recombinant form CRF02(-)AG when the gag fragment was also examined. A large number of different HIV strains were found in Yaounde, including some belonging to group O. Over 20% of infections in Kisumu and around 10% in Yaounde were with isolated intersubtype recombinant forms. All but a few infections in Ndola were with subtype C and no recombinants were found. Conclusions: The pattern of distribution of subtypes that we found does not suggest that differences in circulating subtypes play a major role in explaining the differences in prevalence of HIV-1 infection between the four cities. The emergence and spread of recombinants requires close surveillance to adapt testing strategies if needed, to inform vaccine development and to ascertain their role in the future spread of HIV. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available