4.5 Article

A placebo-controlled trial of low-dose erythromycin to promote feed tolerance in preterm infants

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 90, Issue 8, Pages 904-908

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001.tb02455.x

Keywords

erythromycin; feeding; intolerance; motilin agonist; premature infants

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of erythromycin. a motilin agonist, in promoting enteral feed tolerance in preterm infants of less than or equal to 32 wk gestation. Eligible infants were randomized to receive either low-dose (2.5 mg kg(-1) per dose 6 hourly) oral erythromycin ethylsuccinate or placebo for 10 d from the time of the first oral reed, The data from 22 erythromycin and 21 placebo infants were analysed. Birthweights (erythromycin 1216 +/- 380 g, placebo 1355 +/- 228 g, p = 0.25), gestation (erythromycin 28.6 +/- 2.2 wk, placebo 29.3 +/- 1.7 wk, p = 0.24) and other clinical variables were not different between the groups. Almost all infants were fed expressed breast milk. Erythromycin infants had significantly fewer episodes of large residual gastric aspirates (>30% of the previous 6 h worth of feeds) over 10 d (erythromycin 1.1 +/- 1.9, placebo 3.6 +/- 2.2 episodes, p = 0.0007). Infants in the erythromycin group achieved full oral reeds more quickly (6.0 +/- 2.3 vs 7.9 +/- 3.5 d, P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the number of days oil total parenteral nutrition or to the time needed to regain birthweight. One enrolled infant from each group died of necrotizing enterocolitis, Conclusion: Low-dose erythromycin promoted gastric emptying and feed tolerance in premature infants at a lower gestational age than previously reported. Increased exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics may not be free of risk. Further studies are recommended to assess its efficacy in premature infants with established feed intolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available