4.5 Article

Cytokine gene therapy of gliomas: effective induction of therapeutic immunity to intracranial tumors by peripheral immunization with interleukin-4 transduced glioma cells

Journal

GENE THERAPY
Volume 8, Issue 15, Pages 1157-1166

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301496

Keywords

gliomas; gene therapy; cancer vaccine; cytokines

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA68550, CA68067] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS01810] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To provide a means for comparing strategies for cytokine gene therapy against intracranial (i.c.) tumors, we generated rat gliosarcoma 9L cells transfected with interleukin-4 (9L-IL4), interleukin-12 (9L-IL12), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (9L-GMCSF) or interferon-alpha (9L-IFN alpha). To simulate direct and highly efficient cytokine gene delivery, cytokine transfected 9L tumors were Implanted i.c. into syngeneic rats. i.c. injection led to tumor-outgrowth in the brain and killed most animals, whereas these cell lines were rejected following intradermal (i.d.) injection. Cytokine-expressing i.c. 9L tumors, however, had a greater degree of infiltration by immune cells compared with control, mock-transfected 9L-neo, but to a lesser degree than i.d. cytokine-expressing tumors. Tumor angiogenesis was suppressed in cytokine-transfected tumors. Ina prophylaxis model, i.d. vaccination with 9L-IL4 resulted in long-term survival of 90% of rats challenged i.c. with parental 9L; whereas 40% of 9L-GM-CSF, 40% of 9L-IFN alpha and 0% of 9L-IL12-immunized rats were protected. In a therapy model (day 3 i.c. 9L tumors), only i.d. immunization with 9L-IL4 had long-term therapeutic benefits as 43% of rats survived >100 days. These data indicate that peripheral immunization with 9L-IL4 had the most potent therapeutic benefit among various cytokines and approaches tested against established, i.c. 9L tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available