4.5 Article

Pronostic factors of synchronous brain metastases from lung cancer

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 33, Issue 2-3, Pages 143-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00202-1

Keywords

brain metastases; lung cancer; prognostic factor; neurosurgery; brain radiotherapy; chemotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The prognosis of brain metastases (BM) from lung cancer is poor. The management of lung cancer with BM is not clear. This retrospective study attempts to determine their prognostic factors, and to better define the role of different treatments, Methods: We reviewed the clinical characteristics of 271 consecutive patients with synchronous brain metastases (SBM) from lung cancer (small-cell lung cancers and non-small-cell lung cancers), collected between January 1985 and May 1993. Data were available for all patients as well as follow-up information on all patients through to death. Patients had all undergone heterogeneous treatments. Each physician had chosen the appropriate treatment after collegiate discussion. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test in univariate analysis, and Cox's Regression model in multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Results: 249 patients were assessable. Treatments included: neurosurgical resection in 56 cases, brain irradiation in 87 cases, and chemotherapy in 126 cases. Median overall survival time from the date of histological diagnosis of SBM was 103 days (range, 1-1699). In multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for longer overall survival times were: absence of adrenal metastases (P = 0.007), neurosurgical resection (P = 0.028), chemotherapy (P = 0.032) and brain irradiation (P = 0.008). Moreover, risk factors of intracranial hypertension as cause of death were number of SBM and absence of neurosurgical resection. Conclusions: These results and others suggest that patients with SBM from lung cancer be considered for carcinologic treatment, and not only for best supportive care. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate quality of life with or without carcinologic treatment. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available