4.6 Article

Optimization of cytokine stability in stored amniotic fluid

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 2, Pages 459-462

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.115106

Keywords

amniotic fluid; cytokines; stability; interleukin-6; angiogenin; vascular endothelial growth factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Many studies use stored amniotic, fluid samples to assay cytokines and other proteins for outcome-based research; however, there is little information on the optimal methods of storage. The objective of our study was to evaluate cytokine stability In amniotic fluid stored at different temperatures both with and without a proteolytic enzyme inhibitor. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing midtrimester genetic amniocentesis for routine indications gave consent for the study. After the sample was centrifuged, the acellular portion of the sample was mixed to homogeneity and aliquoted in 0.5-mL increments and stored for 1 year at 4 degreesC, -20 degreesC, and -80 degreesC with and without the protease inhibitor aprotinin. Enzyme-linked immunoassays for angiogenin, interleukin-6, and vascular endothelial growth factor were performed simultaneously on each aliquot. RESULTS: Thirty samples were assayed for each storage condition. Results were calculated as the percentage of its own sister aliquot stored at -80 degreesC without aprotinin. In all samples, there was a significant relation between storage temperature and cytokine levels, with the lowest levels found at 4 degreesC and the highest at -80 degreesC (angiogenin, P = .004; interleukin-6, P < .001; vascular endothelial growth factor, P = .02). The addition of aprotinin improved stability only for angiogenin at all temperatures (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Degradation of cytokines occurs when amniotic fluid samples are stored for prolonged periods at temperatures greater than -80 degreesC. The addition of a protease Inhibitor helps stem the degradation of some cytokines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available