4.1 Article

Structural requirements for the biosynthesis of backbone cyclic peptide libraries

Journal

CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 801-815

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1074-5521(01)00052-7

Keywords

combinatorial chemistry; cyclic peptide; intein; SICLOPPS; small molecule

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR11318] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM19891] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Combinatorial methods for the production of molecular libraries are an important source of ligand diversity for chemical biology. Synthetic methods focus on the production of small molecules that must traverse the cell membrane to elicit a response. Genetic methods enable intracellular ligand production, but products must typically be large molecules in order to withstand cellular catabolism. Here we describe an intein-based approach to biosynthesis of backbone cyclic peptide libraries that combines the strengths of synthetic and genetic methods. Results: Through site-directed mutagenesis we show that the DnaE intein from Synechoeystis sp. PCC6803 is very promiscuous with respect to peptide substrate composition, and can generate cyclic products ranging from four to nine amino acids. Libraries with five variable amino acids and either one or four fixed residues bwere prepared, yielding between 10(7) and 10(8) transformants. The majority of randomly selected clones from each library gave cyclic products. Conclusions: We have developed a versatile method for producing intracellular libraries of small, stable cyclic peptides. Genetic encoding enables facile manipulation of vast numbers of compounds, while low molecular weight ensures ready pharmacophore identification. The demonstrated flexibility of the method towards both peptide length and composition makes it a valuable addition to existing methods for generating ligand diversity. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available