4.7 Article

Effect of glutamine in short-bowel syndrome

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 319-323

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1054/clnu.2001.0433

Keywords

short bowel; glutamine; motility; absorption; diet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims: Animal studies have reported positive effects of glutamine on intestinal absorption and morphology; human studies have been less convincing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of glutamine and diet on intestinal morphology, motility, and absorption. Methods: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in 8 patients with short-bowel on a high carbohydrate, low fat (HCLF) diet, was performed. Active treatment was oral glutamine (0.45 g kg(-1) day(-1)) for eight weeks. Intestinal morphology was evaluated by light microscopy. Gastrointestinal transit was measured by dual gamma camera scintigraphy. D-xylose and fecal fat collection was used to evaluate intestinal absorption. Results of active treatment versus placebo were compared by the signed-rank test. Results: Morphology analysis, reported as median active treatment versus placebo, was villus height: 0.48 mm versus 0.50 mm, P = 1.0, and crypt depth: 0.11 mm versus 0.10 mm, P = 0.469. Percent D-xylose absorption, reported as median active treatment versus placebo, was 7% versus 10.5%, P = 0.109. There was not a significant difference in wet weight or fat absorption compared to placebo, P> 0.05. Likewise, gastrointestinal transit was not different compared to placebo. Conclusions.-The results of this controlled study would support that 8 weeks of treatment with oral glutamine and a HCLF diet does not significantly improve intestinal morphology, gastrointestinal transit, D-xylose absorption and stool losses in short bowel patients. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available