4.7 Article

Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 102, Issue 3-4, Pages 275-297

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00037-4

Keywords

unsaturated hydraulic conductivity; pedo-transfer functions; modeling

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper reviews eight well-known and accepted pedo-transfer functions used for evaluation of soil hydraulic conductivity (saturated and unsaturated) from routinely available soil data. A comprehensive data set containing detailed measurements of 63 German soil horizons, to which none of the models had been previously calibrated, were used for the evaluation of pedo-transfer functions. The paper considers only pedo-transfer functions which have shown good results in the past. The statistical analysis of the eight functions shows that the model of Wosten [J.H.M., Wosten, Pedotransfer functions to evaluate soil quality. In: E.G., Gregorich, M.R., Carter, (Eds.), Soil Quality for Crop Production and Ecosystem Health. Developments in Soils Science, vol. 25, Elsevier, (1997) 221-245.], which requires an input of measured saturated hydraulic conductivity, performs best in terms of prediction of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Evaluation of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity by the pedo-transfer functions shows, on average, better correlations if the saturated hydraulic conductivity tan input parameter) is also obtained from predictions of pedo-transfer functions rather than directly from experiments. This outcome is attributed to a dependence of the saturated hydraulic conductivity on soil structure, i.e. macropores, while the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity is generally more dependent on soil texture. The deviating results of estimated soil hydraulic conductivity, as compared to the experimental data, indicate that the use of pedo-transfer functions based only on estimated soil hydraulic parameters must be carried out with great caution. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available