4.6 Article

Percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) thermal ablation of rabbit tumors embedded in fat - A model for RF ablation of breast tumors

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 8, Pages 480-486

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200108000-00007

Keywords

radiofrequency ablation; animal study; VX2 tumors; breast tumors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. To develop an experimental tumor model for RF ablation of breast tumors surrounded by fat and to investigate the minimally invasive treatment of such tumors by saline-enhanced RF ablation monitored by ultrasound (US). METHODS. Twenty-eight VX2 tumors were implanted into the retroperitoneum of 14 rabbits and monitored by B-mode US at regular intervals of 2 to 3 days. Saline-enhanced RF ablation (25-mm tip length) was performed 16 days after tumor implantation (10-minute treatment time, 28 W, 15 mL/h infusion of 0.9% NaCl, which was increased to 30 mL/h in cases of an impedance increase). Thermal lesion growth was monitored by B-mode US. Treatment was considered complete if no relapse was detectable histopathologically after a follow-up period of up to 3 weeks. RESULTS. All tumor implantations were successful, reaching sizes from 5 to 38 mm 16 days after implantation. Tumors >20 mm showed central necrosis on US. Smaller tumors without signs of necrosis required greater needle perfusion to maintain constant needle-to-tissue impedance. Local relapses occurred in 14 of 27 tumors (51.8%), all with tumors >20 mm. In 12 cases, they were already detected sonographically. In 2 cases, islands of vital tumor were detected only during histopathological assessment. CONCLUSIONS. VX2 tumors are implantable into hypovascular adipose tissue with a high success rate and may be used as a model for RF ablation of breast tumors. B-mode US is not suitable for guiding RF ablation of tumors embedded in fat. The method appears to be more successful with smaller tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available