4.7 Article

Neurogenesis by progenitor cells in the ischemic adult rat hippocampus

Journal

STROKE
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages 1890-1896

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.32.8.1890

Keywords

aging; cerebral ischemia, global; cerebral ischemia, transient; hippocampus; neurogenesis; rats

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose-Recently, there has been great interest in adult neurogenesis. We investigated whether transient forebrain ischemia could influence the proliferation of neuronal progenitor in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the rat hippocampus and whether aging could influence the neurogenesis after ischemia. Methods-Male Wistar rats were subjected to 4-vessel occlusion model. We used a bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling method to identify the postproliferation cells and double-immunostaining with confocal microscopy to determine the cell phenotype. Results-The number of BrdU-positive cells in the SGZ increased approximate to5.7-fold 8 days after ischemia, compared with the control. BrdU-positive cells formed clusters. which suggested that these cells had divided from an original progenitor cell, and expressed Musashi I (Msi1), a marker of neural stem/progenitor cells. Although astrocytes also expressed Msi1 in the adult brain, Msi1-positive cells that formed clusters in the SGZ did not express glial fibrillary acidic protein, an astrocyte marker. About 70% of all BrdU-positive cells in the SGZ represented the neuronal phenotype 4 weeks after the BrdU injection. Although proliferation of progenitor cells was stimulated in both young and older animals, aging accelerated the reduction in newborn cells after ischemia. Conclusions-Our results indicate that ischemic stress stimulated the proliferation of neuronal progenitor cells in the SGZ of both young and old rats but resulted in increased neurogenesis only in young animals. Our findings will be important in developing therapeutic intervention to enhance endogenous neurogenesis after brain injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available