4.3 Article

Low-frequency limit of Jovian radio emissions and implications on source locations and Io plasma wake

Journal

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 49, Issue 10-11, Pages 1137-1149

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00021-6

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After deriving from Ulysses-URAP measurements the low-frequency limit of the Jovian hectometer emission spectrum (250 +/- 50 kHz at the -20 dB level below the emission peak), and confirming the absence of Io's control on Jovian radio emission below similar to 1 MHz, we propose a single common explanation for these low-frequency limits: both are well explained by the quenching of the generation mechanism (the cyclotron-maser instability) where the ratio f(pe)/f(ce) reaches a critical value (about 0.14) along the source field lines. This occurs in the external part of Io's plasma torus for the hectometer component, and in Io's dense plasma wake discovered by Galileo for the Io-dependent (decameter) component. As a consequence, we infer new constraints on Jovian radio source locations, which are found to extend along the L approximate to 6 field lines intersecting Io's wake (where the electron density is up to 10-20 times higher than in the average torus) for the Io-dependent decameter emission, and along L approximate to 7-9 field lines (with apex at approximate to 7-11 R-J) for the hectometer emission. We also infer that the broadband kilometer (auroral) emission originates from L > 10 field lines, with apex well beyond 12 R-J, closing in the distant Jovian magnetosphere or opened to the solar wind. These results confirm and precise the source locations obtained from direction-finding studies with Ulysses. Finally, we discuss implications in terms of source extent and of the origin of the accelerated electrons responsible for the emissions, and we derive lower limits on the proton concentration in Io's plasma wake. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available