4.0 Article

Relationship between systemic markers of inflammation and serum β-carotene levels

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 161, Issue 15, Pages 1903-1908

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.15.1903

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BHP HRSA HHS [T32PE10025] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Low serum levels of beta -carotene have been associated with increased risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease. However, in clinical trials, supplementation of the diet with beta -carotene either had no benefit or caused harm. This pattern of findings raises the possibility that confounding by other factors might explain the association between serum beta -carotene level and disease risk. Methods: We used data from 14470 current smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers aged 18 years or older who participated in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to assess the relationship between serum beta -carotene and markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein and white blood cell count). Results: After adjustment for beta -carotene intake and other factors, geometric mean levels of serum beta -carotene for individuals with undetectable (<0.22 mg/dL), mildly elevated (0.22-0.99 mg/dQ, and clinically elevated (greater than or equal to1.0 mg/dQ C-reactive protein levels were 18.0, 16.1, and 13.6 mug/dL, respectively, in never smokers; 18.1, 15.7, and 13.9 mug/dL in ex-smokers; and 11.3, 10.2, and 9.4 mug/dL in current smokers (P < .001 for all). In corresponding analyses, white blood cell count was also inversely related to serum beta -carotene concentration (P < .05 for all). Conclusions: The strong and inverse association of serum beta -carotene level with C-reactive protein level and white blood cell count suggests that the relationship between serum beta -carotene concentration and disease risk might be confounded by inflammation. More broadly, for beta -carotene and likely other nutrients, it seems unwise to interpret biomarker data as prima facie evidence of dietary intake without a more complete understanding of the physiologic processes that affect nutrient levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available