4.7 Article

Factors affecting membrane fouling reduction by surface modification and backpulsing

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 189, Issue 2, Pages 255-270

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00422-7

Keywords

backpulsing; membrane surface modification; microfiltration; fouling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several factors affecting microfiltration membrane fouling and cleaning, including backpulsing, crossflushing, backwashing, particle size, membrane surface chemistry, and ionic strength, were investigated with suspensions of latex beads. Approximately two-fold permeate volume enhancements over 1 h of filtration were obtained by using water or gas backpulsing, and 50% enhancement was obtained with crossflushing, for filtration of 1.0 mum diameter carboxylate modified latex (CML) particles using unmodified polypropylene (PP) membranes of 0.3 mum nominal pore diameter. When 0.2 mum diameter CML particles or mixtures of 1.0 and 0.2 mum CML particles were used, however. the average flux decreased 60% compared with using 1.0 mum CML particles for experiments with or without backpulsing. PP membranes were rendered hydrophilic with neutral or positively on negatively charged surfaces by grafting monomers of poly(ethylene glycol 200) monomethacrylate (PEG200MA), dimethyl aminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), or acrylic acid (AA), respectively, to the base PP membranes. Filtration experiments show that fouling is not strongly dependent on membrane surface chemistry for filtration of 1.0 mum CML particles without backpulsing. With backpulsing, however. a 10% increase and a 20% decrease of permeate volumes collected in 1 h were observed when the CML particles and the membranes had like charges and opposite charges, respectively, compared to the permeate collected with the unmodified membrane. Using the PP membranes modified with AA, permeate volumes with backpulsing decreased 30 and 40% when NaCl concentrations of 0.01 and 0.1 M, respectively, were added to the feed. However, the permeate volumes did not vary significantly with changing ionic strength for filtration without backpulsing. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available