4.8 Article

Cerebral autoregulatory responses to head-up tilt in normal subjects and patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 104, Issue 8, Pages 898-902

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc3301.094908

Keywords

syncope; cerebrovascular circulation; ultrasonics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-The effect of orthostatic stress on dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) in normal subjects and patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS) is unclear. This study assessed the dynamic CA responses of both groups to head-up tilt. Methods and Results-Seventeen patients with recurrent VVS and 17 pair-matched control subjects underwent 70 degrees head-up tilt for up to 30 minutes. Bilateral middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities (CBFV) were measured with transcranial Doppler ultrasound along with noninvasive beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and transcutaneous and end-tidal CO2 concentrations. Indices of dynamic CA were derived for periods before, during, and after tilt. Eight normal subjects who developed VVS in an identical protocol but who had no previous clinical history of syncope were also studied. CBFV and transcutaneous and end-tidal CO2 levels declined significantly during head-up tilt in all groups (P < 0.0001). Dynamic CA indices were unchanged throughout tilt in nonsyncopal control subjects and were initially unchanged in patients but deteriorated significantly in patients and syncopal control subjects in the minutes before (P = 0.027 and P = 0.012, respectively) and after (P = 0.002 and P = 0.007, respectively) syncope. Conclusions-Dynamic CA is preserved in patients and control subjects initially after head-up tilt. Autoregulatory function remains intact in nonsyncopal control subjects during prolonged orthostasis but deteriorates in patients and syncopal control subjects immediately before and after VVS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available