4.6 Article

Detection of interannual variation of vegetation in middle and southern Italy during 1985-1999 with 1 km NOAA AVHRR NDVI data

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 106, Issue D16, Pages 17863-17876

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2001JD900166

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential of NOAA-advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) time series for environmental studies was investigated at the pixel scale. We analyzed a multitemporal set of annual maximum value composite (MVC) of normalized difference vegetation index. Local area coverage data of middle and southern Italy were processed from measurements taken between 1985 and 1999 of the afternoon viewing of NOAA9, 11, and 14. Significant artificial anomalies were found due to satellite switch, short-wave calibration instability and illumination effects. We removed such systematic errors and achieved a strong reduction of standard deviation values (around 50%). Interesting results were obtained from a change detection analysis performed at the pixel level. Outcomes from satellite-based analysis were compared with independent time series data, such as ancillary meteorological data, forest fire archives, and results from field surveys. Results showed that the geographical areas where MVC data indicated a decrease in vegetation activity match well with areas affected by forest fires, intense human activity, or rapid decline of coniferous forests. In contrast, an increase in MVC was found in regions recently involved in a growth of intensive fanning or invaded by alien plants which are now recognized as a threat to native species. Our exploratory results indicate that high-quality AVHRR data can profitably support studies on interannual dynamics of surface parameters. In particular, our parameterization of illumination and calibration adjustments can be directly applied to Mediterranean-like ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available