4.3 Article

Reckless males, rational females: Dynamic trade-off between food and shelter in the marine isopod Idotea balthica

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES
Volume 79, Issue 3, Pages 175-181

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.005

Keywords

Anti-predator adaptation; Colour polymorphism; Diurnal behaviour; Fucus vesiculosus; Habitat choice; Sexual dimorphism

Funding

  1. Evolutionary Ecology Graduate School
  2. NorFA and Turku University Foundation
  3. Academy of Finland [106237]
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [106237, 106237] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Habitat choice of herbivores is expected to be a resolution of a trade-off between food and shelter. The resolution of this trade-off may, however, be dynamic within a species because distinct phenotypes may value these factors differently and the value may vary temporally. We studied this hypothesis in the marine herbivore Idotea balthica (Isopoda), by simultaneously manipulating both food and shelter, and investigated whether the resolution of the trade-off differed between sexes, colour morphs and day and night (i.e. high and low predation risk). Isopods chose between exposing and concealing backgrounds in which the quantity or quality of food varied. When choosing between the backgrounds in the absence of food, females preferred the concealment more than males did. However, in a trade-off situation the isopods traded shelter for food, and females more so than males. Thus, males' lower preference for the shelter was not counterbalanced by a stronger preference for food. The microhabitat use also differed between night and day showing adaptation to diurnally fluctuating predation risk. We suggest that microhabitat utilization of females is more strongly tied to variation in risk and resources than that of males, for whom other factors, such as seeking mates, may be more important. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available