3.8 Article

Expression of 5α-reductases in human epithelial ovarian cancer:: Its correlation with androgen receptor status

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 92, Issue 9, Pages 926-932

Publisher

BUSINESS CENTER ACADEMIC SOCIETIES JAPAN
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01182.x

Keywords

5 alpha-reductase; androgen receptor; ovarian cancer; RT-PCR; immunohistochemistry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Androgen metabolism and possible actions are considered to play some roles in human epithelial ovarian neoplasms, but the details have not been well studied. We have examined the expression of 5 alpha -reductase type 1 and type 2, which catalyze the conversion of testosterone to more active androgen, 5 alpha -dehydrotestosterone. and androgen receptor (AR), using immunohistochemistry (104 cases) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (16 cases) as a first step toward understanding the metabolism and possible actions of androgens in human common epithelial ovarian carcinoma. 5 alpha -Reductase type 1 was immunopositive in 75/104 cases (72.0%), and 5 alpha -reductase type 2 in 52/104 cases (50.0%) (P<0.001). There was no significant correlation between patterns of immunolocalization and clinicopathological parameters examined. Median labeling index (LI) for AR was 17.8% (range 0-84.4%) which was significantly higher in serous carcinoma than other histological types (P<0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between 5 alpha -reductase type 1 immunoreactivity and AR Ll (P=0.0027), but no significant correlation was detected in 5 alpha -reductase type 2. Results of RT-PCR analysis were also consistent with those of immunohistochemistry. The relatively wide distribution of 5 alpha -reductase type 1, and its correlation to AR status in human epithelial ovarian malignancies suggest that this isozyme plays important roles in androgen metabolism and actions in these tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available