4.4 Article

Regulation of prostate branching morphogenesis by activin A and follistatin

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 237, Issue 1, Pages 145-158

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0364

Keywords

activin; follistatin; prostate; branching morphogenesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ventral prostate development occurs by branching morphogenesis and is an androgen-dependent process modulated by growth factors. Many growth factors have been implicated in branching morphogenesis including activins (dimers of beta (A) and beta (B) subunits); activin A inhibited branching of lung and kidney in vitro. Our aim was to examine the role of activins on prostatic development in vitro and their localization in vivo. Organ culture of day 0 rat ventral prostates for 6 days with activin A (+/- testosterone) inhibited prostatic branching and growth without increasing apoptosis. The activin-binding protein follistatin increased branching in vitro in the absence (but not presence) of testosterone, suggesting endogenous activins may reduce prostatic branching morphogenesis. In vivo, inhibin subunit was not expressed until puberty, therefore inhibins (dimers of alpha and beta subunits) are not involved in prostatic development. Activin beta (A) was immunolocalized to developing prostatic epithelium and mesenchymal aggregates at ductal tips. Activin beta (B) immunoreactivity was weak during development, but was upregulated in prostatic epithelium during puberty. Activin receptors were expressed throughout the prostatic epithelium. Follistatin mRNA and protein were expressed throughout the prostatic epithelium. The in vitro evidence that activin and follistatin have opposing effects on ductal branching suggests a role for activin as a negative regulator of prostatic ductal branching morphogenesis. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available