4.0 Article

Cerebral ischemia-induced difference in sensitivity to depression and potential therapeutics in rats

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 222-228

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283618afe

Keywords

antidepressant; brain-derived neurotrophic factor; bryostatin; cerebral ischemia; depression; hypoxia; rat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 'vascular depression' hypothesis has recently attracted significant research attention, although the causal relationship between vascular-related injuries and depression has not been established. Here, we show that one episode of cerebral ischemia was sufficient to greatly increase the sensitivity of rats to potentially depressogenic events, evaluated at below-threshold intensities in the open space swim test. The induced 'ischemic depression' was lasting and sensitive to an acute administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor or bryostatin-1, a relatively selective activator of protein kinase C epsilon, during the induction phase. Chronic treatment with bryostatin-1 (5 weeks) after the induction of depressive behavior reversed the depressive immobility and produced a lasting therapeutic effect, which remained effective 3 weeks after discontinuation of the treatment. Similar treatment with alaproclate, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in contrast, produced temporary relief from the depressive symptoms, with the therapeutic effect disappearing soon after the end of the treatment. The results strongly suggest that cerebral ischemia has a direct role in shaping the sensitivity of an individual to depressogenic events and that bryostatin-1-like agents may be developed as therapeutics for treating ischemic depression in humans. Behavioural Pharmacology 24: 222-228 (C) 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Behavioural Pharmacology 2013, 24: 222-228

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available