4.0 Article

Role of μ-opioid receptor reserve and μ-agonist efficacy as determinants of the effects of μ-agonists on intracranial self-stimulation in rats

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 678-692

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328358593c

Keywords

drug abuse; efficacy; intracranial self-stimulation; morphine; opioid; rat

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-NS070715, T32-DA007027]
  2. Jordan University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The net effect of g-opioid receptor agonists on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in rats reflects an integration of rate-increasing and rate-decreasing effects. Previous opioid exposure is associated with tolerance to rate-decreasing effects and the augmented expression of abuse-related rate-increasing effects. This finding was replicated here with morphine. Subsequent studies then tested the hypothesis that opioid agonist-induced rate-decreasing effects require the activation of a larger relative fraction of mu receptors, and hence are more vulnerable to tolerance-associated reductions in receptor density than rate-increasing effects. Two sets of experiments were conducted to test this hypothesis. First, the effects of morphine on ICSS were examined after pretreatment with the irreversible g antagonist beta-funaltrexamine to reduce the density of available mu receptors. Second, effects were examined for a range of mu opioids that varied in relative efficacy at g receptors. The hypothesis predicted that (a) morphine, after beta-funaltrexamine treatment, or (b) low-efficacy mu agonists would mimic the effects of morphine tolerance to produce the reduced expression of rate-decreasing effects and enhanced expression of rate-increasing effects. Neither of these predictions were supported. These results indicate that mu agonist-induced facilitation and depression of ICSS may be mediated by distinct populations of mu receptors that respond differently to regimens of opioid exposure. Behavioural Pharmacology 23:678-692 (c) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available