4.0 Article

Environmental enrichment during development decreases intravenous self-administration of methylphenidate at low unit doses in rats

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 650-657

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283584765

Keywords

environmental enrichment; methylphenidate; progressive ratio; rat; self-administration

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DA12964, P50 DA05312, T32 DA016176]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the efficacy and widespread use of methylphenidate (MPH) as a treatment modality for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, clinical and preclinical findings indicate that it has abuse potential. Environmental enrichment reduces susceptibility to cocaine and amphetamine self-administration and decreases impulsive behavior, but its effects on MPH self-administration are unknown. The present experiments sought to determine the influence of environmental enrichment on MPH self-administration. Male rats were raised in an enriched condition (EC) or isolated condition (IC). They were trained to self-administer MPH (0.3 mg/kg/infusion) and then exposed to varying doses of MPH on either a fixed-ratio (experiment 1) or a progressive-ratio (experiment 2) schedule of reinforcement EC rats earned significantly fewer infusions of MPH at low doses (0.03 and 0.056 mg/kg/infusion) compared with IC rats under both schedules; however, no differences were observed at high unit doses (0.1-1.0 mg/kg/infusion). During saline substitution at the end of MPH self-administration, EC rats also responded less for saline compared with IC rats, indicative of more rapid extinction. As with other stimulant drugs with different mechanisms of action, environmental enrichment during development protects against self-administration of MPH at low unit doses but not at high unit doses. Behavioural Pharmacology 23:650-657 (c) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available