4.6 Article

Peptide requirement for CTL activation reflects the sensitivity to CD3 engagement:: Correlation with CD8αβ versus CD8αα expression

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 5, Pages 2577-2584

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.5.2577

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI43591] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In our previous studies, CTL that were sensitive to low concentrations of peptide Ag were found to be far superior to those requiring high concentrations of Ag for reducing viral burden when adoptively transferred into SCID mice. Thus it is important that we understand the mechanisms that control the requirement for peptide Ag with the long-term goal of selectively expanding these exquisitely sensitive cells in vivo. Although TCR affinity is one parameter that can affect the CTL sensitivity for Ag, we investigated whether additional mechanisms may also be involved. In studies using a TCR transgenic mouse model, we successfully generated CTL with identical TCR affinity that possess distinctly different activation requirements. Using both peptide Ag and anti-CD3 Ab to activate the CTL lines of high vs low avidity, we found that the variations in activation threshold are the result of differences in the required number of engaged TCR. Additionally, we have observed that the ratio of CD8 alpha beta to CD8 alpha alpha is significantly greater in CTL lines that are more sensitive to TCR engagement, which may contribute to the lower activation threshold of these CTL following CD3 engagement. These studies identify a novel mechanism by which the activation requirements of Ag-specific CTL are determined by demonstrating a direct correlation between the sensitivity to TCR engagement, the expression of levels CD8 alpha beta vs alpha alpha, and the amount of peptide Ag required to reach the threshold for activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available