4.0 Article

α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonists with low intrinsic efficacy have antidepressant-like properties

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 291-299

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328347546d

Keywords

depression; forced-swim test; mouse; nicotinic acetylcholine receptors; novelty-suppressed feeding; partial agonists; tail-suspension test

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [MH077681]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA00436]
  3. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have suggested that treatment with antagonists or partial agonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors containing the beta 2-subunit (beta 2* nAChRs) results in antidepressant-like effects. In this study, we tested three novel compounds with different affinity and functional efficacy at alpha 4 beta 2* nAChRs, which were synthesized as part of nAChR discovery projects at Pfizer, in the tail-suspension, forced-swim, and novelty-suppressed feeding tests of antidepressant efficacy. All compounds tested reduced immobility in the forced-swim test and one of the compounds also reduced immobility in the tail-suspension test. All the compounds appeared to affect food intake on their own, with two compounds reducing feeding significantly in the home cage, precluding a clear interpretation of the results in the novelty-suppressed feeding test. None of the compounds altered locomotor activity at the doses and time points used here. Therefore, a subset of these compounds has pharmacological and behavioral properties that demonstrate the potential of nicotinic compounds as a treatment of mood disorders. Further development of nicotinic-based antidepressants should focus on increasing nAChR subtype selectivity to obtain consistent antidepressant properties with an acceptable side-effect profile. Behavioural Pharmacology 22: 291-299 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available