4.0 Article

Antidepressant-like effects of rosiglitazone, a PPAR gamma agonist, in the rat forced swim and mouse tail suspension tests

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 635-642

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328331b9bf

Keywords

depression; forced swimming test; mouse; plasma corticosterone; rat; rosiglitazone; tail suspension test

Funding

  1. King Saud University Research Centre
  2. Department of Pharmacology, King Saud University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several studies have evaluated thiazolidinedione therapy as medical treatments for some central nervous system disorders, such as cognitive deficits associated with neurodegenerative disorders. However, there is limited data to support a direct role for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists; in depression. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate antidepressant-like activity of rosiglitazone using the mouse tail suspension test and the rat forced swimming test, two models sensitive to the effects of antidepressants. In the tail suspension test, 5 days of treatment with rosiglitazone (8.5 or 17 mg/kg, orally) reduced immobility time. In the forced swimming test, rosiglitazone (6 or 12 mg/kg, orally) treatment decreased immobility time and increased climbing. These effects were not accompanied by any alteration in locomotor activity in the open field test. Rosiglitazone treatment (6 or 12 mg/kg, orally) significantly reduced plasma corticosterone levels in rats. GW9662 significantly inhibited the rosiglitazone-induced reduction in the duration of immobility. In summary, this study suggests that rosiglitazone possesses a specific antidepressant-like activity in behavioral models and that this effect may be mediated by reduction of plasma corticosterone level. Behavioural Pharmacology 20:635-642 (c) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available