4.6 Article

Mutation and overexpression of the β-catenin gene may play an important role in primary hepatocellular carcinoma among Chinese people

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue 9, Pages 577-581

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004320100259

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; Wnt; beta-catenin gene

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To study the role of beta -catenin gene mutation and expression in hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Method. Thirty-four hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) specimens and adjacent para-cancerous tissues, and four normal liver tissues were analyzed. Subcellular distribution of beta -catenin was examined by immunohistochemistry staining. Mutation and semiquantitative expression of beta -catenin gene exon 3 mRNA were detected by RT-PCR-SSCP and in situ hybridization. Result: Immunohistochemistry showed that all normal liver tissues and para-cancerous tissues examined showed membranous-type staining for beta -catenin protein., frequently with weak expression in the cytoplasm, but no beta -catenin accumulation in nuclei was found; while in liver cancer, 21 cases (61.8 %) of HCC examined showed accumulated type in cytoplasms or nuclei. On SSCP, 15 cases (44.1 %) of HCC altogether displayed three kinds of characteristic mutational mobility shifts. No abnormal shifting bands were found in tissues from normal liver or para-cancerous area. The beta -catenin gene exon 3 mRNA expression index of 34 HCCs was higher than that of para-cancerous tissue and normal liver tissue. Using in situ hybridization, the signal corresponding to beta -catenin gene exon 3 mRNA was particularly strong in cytoplasm of HCC when compared with those of paracancerous tissues and normal liver tissues. Conclusion: beta -catenin gene mutation and overexpression may have a critical role in malignant progression of hepatic carcinogenesis among Chinese people.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available