4.7 Review

Oxidative addition of Pd to C-H, C-C and C-Cl bonds: Importance of relativistic effects in DFT calculations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 115, Issue 9, Pages 4030-4040

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1388040

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the importance of relativistic effects for the quantum chemical description of oxidative addition reactions of palladium to C-H, C-C and C-CI bonds., we have carried out a systematic study of the corresponding reactions of CH4, C2H6 and CH3Cl with Pd-d(10) using nonrelativistic (NR), quasirelativistic (QR), and zeroth-order regularly approximated (ZORA) relativistic density functional theory (DFT) at the BP86/TZ(2)P level. Relativistic effects are important according to both QR and ZORA, the former yielding similar but somewhat more pronounced effects than the latter, more reliable method: activation barriers are reduced by 6-14 kcal/mol and reaction enthalpies become 15-20 kcal/mol more exothermic if one goes from NR to ZORA. This yields, for example, 298 K activation enthalpies DeltaH(298)(not equal) of -5.0 (C-H), 9.6 (C-C) and -6.0 kcal/mol (C-Cl) relative to the separate reactants at ZORA-BP86/TZ(2)P. In accordance with gas-phase experiments on reactions of Pd with alkanes, we find reaction profiles with pronounced potential wells for reactant complexes (collisionally stabilized and observed in experiments for alkanes larger than CH4) at -11.4 (CH4), -11.6 (C2H6) and -15.6 kcal/mol (CH3Cl) relative to separated reactants [ZORA-BP86/TZ(2)P]. Furthermore, we analyze the height of and the relativistic effects on the activation energies DeltaE(not equal) in terms of the activation strain DeltaE(strain)(not equal) in of and the transition-state interaction DeltaE(int)(not equal) between the reactants in the activated complex, with DeltaE(not equal) = DeltaE(strain)(not equal) + DeltaE(int)(not equal). (C) 2001 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available