4.2 Article

Changes in parahippocampal white matter integrity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A diffusion tensor imaging study

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1-2, Pages 51-61

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2009/408037

Keywords

MRI; dementia; perforant path; tractography; entorhinal cortex; magnetic resonance imaging; hippocampus; memory; mesial temporal lobe; volumetry

Funding

  1. national Institute on Aging [P01 AG09466, P30 AG10161, T32 AG00257]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG009466, T32AG000257, P01AG014449, R01AG043375, P30AG010161] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, changes in the parahippocampal white matter (PWM), in the region that includes the perforant path, were investigated, in vivo, in 14 individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) compared to 14 elderly controls with no cognitive impairment (NCI). For this purpose, (1) volumetry; (2) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) derived measures of mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA); and (3) tractography were used. In addition, regression models were utilized to examine the association of PWM measurements with memory decline. The results from this study confirm previous findings in our laboratory and others, showing that compared to controls, individuals with aMCI have PWM volume loss. In addition to volume reduction, participants with aMCI demonstrated a significant increase in MD, but no difference in FA, both in the PWM region and in fibers modeled to pass through the PWM region. Further, the DTI metric of MD was associated with declarative memory performance, suggesting it may be a sensitive marker for memory dysfunction. These results indicate that there is general tissue loss and degradation (decreased volume; increased MD) in individuals with aMCI compared to older people with normal cognitive function. However, the microstructural organization of remaining fibers, as determined by measures of anisotropic diffusion, is not significantly different from that of controls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available