4.6 Article

Voluntary exercise counteracts Aβ25-35-induced memory impairment in mice

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages 618-625

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.024

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Voluntary exercise; Amyloid peptide; Neurotoxicity; Oxidative stress; Angiogenesis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901578, 81271210]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Personnel Department the Great of Six Talented Man Peak Project [2011-WS-031]
  3. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province Department of Education [JX2161015003]
  4. Medical Key Talented Person Foundation of the Jiangsu Provincial Developing Health Project [RC2011072]
  5. Nature & Science project in Suzhou [SYSD2011044]
  6. department of rehabilitation medicine of Jiangsu Province Hospital [XK20200905]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exercise has been shown to enhance hippocampus-related cognition and slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, whether voluntary exercise directly decreases the neurotoxicity of amyloid peptide (A beta) needs to be determined. In the present study, two-month old male C57bl/6 mice were intracerebroventricularly injected with A beta 25-35, and then allowed for voluntary exercise for 12 days. Y-maze test revealed that voluntary exercise mitigated spatial memory impairment induced by A beta 25-35. Consistently, A beta 25-35 treated mice with exercise showed reduced neuronal degeneration and synaptic protein loss in the hippocampus compared with sedentary controls. Moreover, voluntary exercise significantly ameliorated oxidative stress markers and increased vessel branches in the hippocampus of A beta 25-35 treated mice. Our results suggest that voluntary exercise counteracts the neurotoxicity of A beta by reducing oxidative stress and increasing angiogenesis, which may underlie the beneficial effect of exercise on AD. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available