4.5 Article

Lack of amiloride-sensitive transport across alveolar and respiratory epithelium of iNOS(-/-) mice in vivo

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.2001.281.3.L722

Keywords

nitric oxide; osmolality; hyperoxia; nasal potential difference; inducible nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-31197, HL-51173] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30-DK-54781] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extent to which endogenously generated nitric oxide alters Na+ transport across the mammalian alveolar epithelium in vivo has not been documented. Herein we measured alveolar fluid clearance and nasal potential differences in mice lacking the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase [iNOS; iNOS(-/-)] and their corresponding wildtype controls [iNOS(+/+)]. Alveolar fluid clearance values in iNOS(+/+) and iNOS(-/-) anesthetized mice with normal oxygenation and acid-base balance were similar to 30% of instilled fluid/30 min. In both groups of mice, fluid absorption was dependent on vectorial Na+ movement. Amiloride (1.5 mM) decreased alveolar fluid clearance in iNOS(+/+) mice by 61%, whereas forskolin (50 muM) increased alveolar fluid clearance by 55% by stimulating amiloride-insensitive pathways. Neither agent altered alveolar fluid clearance in iNOS(-/-) mice. Hyperoxia upregulated iNOS expression in iNOS(+/+) mice and decreased their amiloride-sensitive component of alveolar fluid clearance but had no effect on the corresponding values in iNOS(-/-) mice. Nasal potential difference measurements were consistent with alveolar fluid clearance in that both groups of mice had similar baseline values, which were amiloride sensitive in the iNOS(+/+) but not in the iNOS(-/-) mice. These data suggest that nitric oxide produced by iNOS under basal conditions plays an important role in regulating amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels in alveolar and airway epithelia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available