4.6 Article

Odor-enriched environment rescues long-term social memory, but does not improve olfaction in social isolated adult mice

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 228, Issue 2, Pages 440-446

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.12.040

Keywords

Social memory; Social isolation; Anxiety; Olfaction; Odor-enriched environment; Inhibitory avoidance; Object recognition

Funding

  1. FAPEMIG
  2. CNPq
  3. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prolonged permanence of animals under social isolation (SI) arouses a variety of psychological symptoms like aggression, stress, anxiety and depression. However, short-term SI is commonly used to evaluate social memory. Interestingly, the social memory cannot be accessed with delays higher than 30 min in SI mice. Our hypothesis is that SI with intermediate duration, like one week (1 w), impairs the long-term storage of new social information (S-LTM), without affecting anxiety or other types of memories, because the SI compromises the olfactory function of the animal. Our results demonstrated that SI impaired S-LTM, without affecting other kinds of memory or anxiety. In addition, the SI increased the latency in the buried-food finding task, but did not affect the habituation or the discrimination of odors. Next, we postulated that if continuous input to the olfactory system is fundamental for the maintenance of the olfactory function and social memory persistence, isolated mice under odor-enriched environment (OEE) should behave like group-housed (GH) animals. In fact, the OEE prevented the S-LTM deficit imposed by the SI. However, OEE did not restore the SI mice olfaction to the GH mice level. Our results suggest that SI modulates olfaction and social memory persistence, probably, by independent mechanisms. We also showed for the first time that OEE rescued S-LTM in SI mice through a mechanism not necessarily involved with olfaction. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available