4.6 Article

Postmenopausal hormone use impact on emotion processing circuitry

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 226, Issue 1, Pages 147-153

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.012

Keywords

Estrogen; Progesterone; Hormone therapy; Postmenopause; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Emotion

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources [K23 RR17043, UL1RR024896]
  2. National Institute for Child Health and Human Development [5T32HD007048]
  3. National Institute on Aging
  4. Office for Research on Women's Health [RO1AG027675]
  5. University of Michigan
  6. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [T32HD007048] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [K23RR017043, UL1RR024986] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK020572] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG027675] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite considerable evidence for potential effects of estrogen on emotional processing, several studies of postmenopausal women who began hormone therapy (FIT) remote from menopause report no effects of HT on emotional measures. As early HT initiation may preserve brain mechanisms, we examined effects of FIT on emotional processing in postmenopausal women who started FIT early after menopause. We performed a cross-sectional comparison of 52 postmenopausal women 66 +/- 5 years old, including 15 users of conjugated equine estrogen, 20 users of conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, and 17 who never used hormones (NT). All hormone users started therapy within two years of menopause, and received at least 10 years of continuous therapy. Outcomes were fMRI-detected brain activity and behavioral measures during an emotional processing picture rating task. During processing of positive pictures, NT women had greater activation than estrogen treated women in medial prefrontal cortex extending to the anterior cingulate, and more activation than estrogen plus progestin treated women in the insula. During processing of negative pictures, estrogen treated women had higher activation than NT women in the entorhinal cortex. Current compared to past HT users showed greater activation in the hippocampus and higher emotion recognition accuracy of neutral stimuli. Estrogen plus progestin treated women had slower response time than NT women when rating all pictures. In conclusion, hormone use was associated with differences in brain functional responses during emotional processing. These fMRI effects were more prominent than those observed for behavioral measures and involved brain regions implicated in cognitive-emotional integration. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available