4.6 Article

Repeated treatment with a low dose of reserpine as a progressive model of Parkinson's disease

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 231, Issue 1, Pages 154-163

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.008

Keywords

Reserpine; Parkinson's disease; Memory; Movement disorders; Oxidative stress; Animal model

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  3. Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (FAPERN)
  4. Pro-reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (PROPESQ/UFRN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal models are widely used to study alterations caused by Parkinson's disease (PD). However, in general, pharmacological models do not express the progressive nature of the disease, being characterized by immediate severe motor impairment after a single dose of the drug. Reserpine administration in rodents has been suggested as a pharmacological model of PD based on the effects of this monoamine-depleting agent on motor activity. Here, we describe that repeated administration with a low dose (0.1 mg/kg) of reserpine in rats induces a gradual appearance of motor signs, evaluated by catalepsy behavior. Furthermore, these motor signs are accompanied by increased levels of striatal lipid peroxidation. However, treatment with reserpine failed to induce memory impairments (evaluated by novel object recognition and discriminative avoidance tasks) and alterations in hippocampal lipid peroxidation. Thus, repeated treatment with low doses of reserpine progressively induces alterations in motor function and an increase in striatal oxidative stress, indicating a possible application of this model in the study of the neuroprogressive nature of the motor signs in PD. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available