4.7 Article

Advanced glycation end products in nondiabetic patients with coronary artery disease

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1620-1623

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.9.1620

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To investigate whether advanced glycation end products (AGEs) participate in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Serum concentrations of AGEs were measured using a newly established enzyme-linked immunosorbent. assay in 48 nondiabetic patients (normal glucose tolerance, n = 20; impaired glucose tolerance, n = 28) who received coronary angiography for the study of chest pain or suspected CAD. Insulin sensitivity was examined by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp technique and was estimated as the mean glucose infusion rate during the last 30 min of clamp time (M value). RESULTS- Patients were classified into four groups based on the number of significantly stenosed vessels, defined as 0-, 1-, 2-, or 3-vessel disease. Serum concentrations of AGEs were significantly higher in nondiabetic subjects with CAD than in control subjects (2.42 +/- 0.65 vs. 1.96 +/- 0.40 mU/ml, P < 0.01) and significantly correlated with the number of significantly stenosed vessels (r = 0.678, P < 0.001). M values significantly inversely correlated with serum concentrations of AGEs (r = -0.490, P < 0.05). In multiple regression analysis, with the number of significantly, stenosed Vessels as the dependent variable, serum concentrations of AGEs. 2-h plasma glucose, and areas under the plasma glucose response curve were independently associated. CONCLUSIONS - This pilot study indicates the relation between AGEs and the severity of CAD in nondiabetic patients. The measurement of serum AGE concentrations may be predictive of vascular damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available