4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Predictors of psychological adjustment in school-age children infected with HIV

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 343-352

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/26.6.343

Keywords

pediatric HIV; psychological adjustment; stress; coping

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess for significant differences in psychological functioning between HIV-infected children and a demographically matched healthy control group and to examine the utility of applying a stress and coping model to children with HIV disease. Methods: Participants included HIV-infected children (ages 6-16) and their caregivers (n = 36) and a control group of healthy children and their caregivers (n = 32). During routine clinic visits, children completed measures of psychological adjustment, health locus of control, and coping style, and caregivers completed measures of their own and their child's psychological adjustment. Results: Caregiver-reported and child self-reported psychological adjustment scores did not significantly differ between the HIV and control groups, with the exception of significantly more internalizing behavior problems reported in the control group. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that the stress and coping model accounted for 36% of the variance in HIV-infected children's self-reported psychological adjustment. In addition, child age and coping style were significant predictors of child self-reported psychological adjustment, but not of caregiver-reported child adjustment. Conclusions: Approximately 25% of children with HIV disease exhibited clinically significant emotional or behavioral problems; however, even higher rates of psychological adjustment problems were found in healthy children. Children with HIV disease who have not been told their diagnosis and children who endorse more emotion-focused coping strategies tend to exhibit more psychological adjustment problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available