4.7 Article

Leptin and leptin-binding activity in women with recurrent miscarriage: correlation with pregnancy outcome

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 2008-2013

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.2008

Keywords

leptin; leptin-binding activity; pregnancy outcome; recurrent miscarriage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in humans and mice have suggested the importance of leptin in fetal growth. Recurrent miscarriage may be a result of abnormal placental and/or fetal development and therefore abnormal leptin levels may be associated with this form of pregnancy loss. METHODS: Leptin and leptin-binding activity (LBA) were measured in blood obtained from women who had a history of recurrent miscarriage (n=53) during weeks 5-6 and 7-8 of pregnancy, and the concentrations were correlated with subsequent pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: Concentrations of leptin ranged from 1.4-62.8 ng/ml, but there was a strong correlation (r=0.825, P<0.001) between leptin values at weeks 5-6 and 7-8 in the same woman. Women who subsequently miscarried had significantly lower plasma leptin concentrations on both weeks 5-6 (13.342.1 ng/ml) (P<0.05) and 7-8 (13.712.4 ng/ml) (P<0.01) of pregnancy, than women who subsequently had a term birth (22.042.43 ng/ml week 5-6, 24.76 +/-3.66 ng/ml week 7-8). LBA values ranged from 1-8.5% but there was no significant difference in LBA in blood obtained from women who subsequently miscarried or had a live birth. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly lower concentrations of leptin in women who subsequently miscarried suggest that leptin may play a role in preventing miscarriage. However, as there was a considerable overlap between the values of leptin in women who subsequently miscarried, and those that had a live birth, these measurements are of limited use in the prediction of pregnancy outcome in these women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available