4.5 Article

Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced dopaminergic neurodegeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages 1073-1082

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00490.x

Keywords

(-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate; N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine; neuroclegenerative diseases; oxidative stress; Parkinson's disease; polyphenols

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study we demonstrate neuroprotective property of green tea extract and (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mice model of Parkinson's disease. N-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine neurotoxin caused dopamine neuron loss in substantia nigra concomitant with a depletion in striatal dopamine and tyrosine hydroxylase protein levels. Pretreatment of mice with either green tea extract (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) or (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (2 and 10 mg/kg) prevented these effects. In addition, the neurotoxin caused an elevation in striatal antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase (240%) and catalase (165%) activities, both effects being prevented by (-) -epigallocatechin-3-gallate. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate itself also increased the activities of both enzymes in the brain. The neuroprotective effects are not likely to be caused by inhibition of N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine conversion to its active metabolite 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium by monoamine oxidase-B, as both green tea and (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate are very poor inhibitors of this enzyme in vitro (770 mug/mL and 660 mum, respectively). Brain penetrating property of polyphenols, as well as their antioxidant and iron-chelating properties may make such compounds an important class of drugs to be developed for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases where oxidative stress has been implicated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available