4.4 Article

High FSH:LH ratio and low LH levels in basal cycle day 3:: Impact on follicular development and IVF outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages 499-505

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016601110424

Keywords

basal serum LH/FSH : LH ratio; fertilization; implantation; pregnancy; preovulatory oocytes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. To examine the impact of low basal cycle day 3 serum LH levels or a high FSH.-LH ratio on IVF results. Methods. A homogeneous group of patients was analyzed as identified by normal basal cycle of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), Luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E-2) levels. High responders (high LH:FSH ratio) and low responders (high FSH or E2 levels, and women greater than or equal to 42 years of age) were excluded from analysis. Only cycles stimulated with a combination of a GnRHa (luteal suppression) and pure FSH were studied. Results. Patients with low basal LH levels (<3 mIU/mL) did not differ significantly from controls in terms of response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation but there was a clear trend toward poorer implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. On the other hand, patients with a high FSH.-LH ratio (>3) had significantly fewer mature oocytes aspirated, and lower implantation and clinical pregnancy rates than patients with gonadotropin ratio <3. These negative effects were evident in the presence of normal basal FSH levels and after adequate matching of female's age and number of embryos transferred. Conclusions. These studies highlight a negative impact of a basal cycle high FSH.-LH ratio (and possibly low LH levels) on follicular development and oocyte quality in these patients subjected to pituitary down-regulation followed by pure FSH administration. A high FSH.-LH ratio may be therefore used as an early biomarker of poor ovarian response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available