4.6 Article

Pre-surgical training ameliorates orbitofrontal-mediated impairments in spatial reversal learning

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 197, Issue 2, Pages 469-475

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.005

Keywords

Spatial reversal learning; Operant behaviour; Orbitofrontal cortex; Disinhibition; Discrimination; Excitotoxic lesion

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [076274/4/Z/04/Z]
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Domestic Research Studentship
  4. Cambridge European Trusts
  5. Bakalas Foundation Scholarship
  6. Downing College
  7. Medical Research Council [G0001354B, G0001354] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently reported that orbitofrontal cortical (OFC) lesions impaired reversal learning of an instrumental two-lever spatial discrimination task, a deficit manifested as increased perseveration on the pre-potent response. Here we examine whether exposure to reversal learning test pre-operatively may have a beneficial effect for future reversal learning of OFC-lesioned animals. Rats were trained on a novel instrumental two-lever spatial discrimination and reversal learning task, measuring both 'cognitive flexibility' and constituent processes including response inhibition. Both levers were presented, only one of which was reinforced. The rat was required to respond on the reinforced lever under a fixed ratio 3 schedule of reinforcement. Following attainment of criterion, two reversals were introduced. Rats were then matched according to their reversal performance and subjected to bilateral excitotoxic OFC lesions. Following recovery, a series of four reversals was presented. OFC lesions impaired neither retention nor reversal phases. These data, together with the previously reported reversal deficit following OFC lesions, suggest that OFC is not needed when task experience has been gained but it is necessary when task demands are relatively high. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available