4.6 Article

MGlu5 antagonism impairs exploration and memory of spatial and non-spatial stimuli in rats

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 191, Issue 2, Pages 235-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.032

Keywords

mGlu5 receptor; antagonist; MPEP; rat; exploration; maze learning; object recognition; prelimbic cortex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu5) has been implicated in memory processing in some but not all learning tasks. The reason why this receptor is involved in some tasks but not in others remains to be determined. The present experiments using rats examined effects of the mGlu5-antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) - applied systemically i.p. (1-10 mg/kg) or bilaterally into the prelimbic cortex (1-10 mu g) - on the ability of rats to explore and remember new stimuli. A cross-maze, open field, and object recognition task were used to evaluate exploration and memory and it was found that: (1) locomotion during exploration of spatial environments and exploration time at novel objects were reduced by i.p. but not by prelimbic administration of MPEP, (2) spatial short-term memory was impaired in cross-maze and object discrimination was reduced after both types of administration, (3) long-term retention of spatial conditioning in the cross-maze was inhibited after i.p. applications which (4) also inhibited spontaneous alternation performance during maze-exploration. Reduced exploratory locomotion and exploration time after i.p. injections may have contributed to the observed retention impairments. However, the fact that prelimbic administration of MPEP inhibited retention without reducing exploration shows that memory formation was also impacted directly by prelimbic mGIu5 in both spatial and non-spatial learning. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available