4.6 Article

Time course of choice reaction time deficits in the HdhQ92 knock-in mouse model of Huntington's disease in the operant Serial Implicit Learning Task (SILT)

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 189, Issue 2, Pages 317-324

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.01.020

Keywords

Huntington's disease; Hdh(Q92) mouse model; 9-hole box; motor learning; implicit learning; operant tests

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G0500794] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0500794] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0500794] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A range of transgenic and knock-in mouse models of Huntington's disease have been created since identification in 1993 of the disease mutation in the HD gene. Knock-in models that express the full-length mutant protein tend to exhibit less severe behavioural deficits than transgenic models and so require more sensitive tasks in order to reveal impairments. To achieve this, we therefore used a Serial Implicit Learning Task (SILT), which measures serial reaction times to visual stimuli, requiring detection and responding in both predictable and unpredictable locations in the 9-hole operant chamber. We have previously reported that knock-in Hdh(Q92/Q92) mice exhibit a modest impairment in learning the SILT tasks at 4 months of age, prior to the formation of overt neuronal nuclear inclusions. In the present study we have explored the time course of the development of impairments from 5 to 14 months of age. The deficit previously found in accuracy and reaction time was present at all ages examined in these Hdh(Q92/Q92) mice; the deficit was not progressive, and did not correlate with the evolution of neuronal nuclear inclusions. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available