4.7 Review

Visible light-dependent degradation of lipidic phytoplanktonic components during senescence: a review

Journal

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 187-202

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00202-3

Keywords

visible light-induced degradation; lipids; phytodetritus; senescence; tracers of photo-oxidative alterations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Though most of the organic components of phytoplankton are susceptible to being photodegraded during senescence, until recent years there has been very little research in this area. Recently, however, there have been a renewal of interest, and the heterogeneous visible light-induced degradative reactions of lipidic compounds associated with phytodetritus have been studied. The present paper reviews the results obtained in the course of these studies. In the first part, the production and quenching of excited states of chlorophyll and toxic oxygen species (singlet oxygen, superoxide ion, hydroxyl radical and hydrogen peroxide) in healthy and senescent phytoplanktonic cells are discussed. Then, the photo-oxidation of the main lipidic cell components (chlorophyll, chlorophyll phytyl chain, carotenoids, sterols, unsaturated fatty acids, alkenones and unsaturated alkenes) in senescent phytoplanktonic cells is examined. Emphasis is given to the degradation rates and the mechanisms of visible light-induced degradation of the main lipidic components of phytoplankton and to the structure of the photoproducts formed. In each case, the selectivity of these compounds is discussed in order to select a pool of photoproducts able to act as tracers of photo-oxidative alterations in the marine medium. This pool of photoproducts could provide very useful information concerning the physiological state of phytoplanktonic communities and current environmental problems related to ozone depletion. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available