4.3 Review

Numerical competence in animals, with an insight from ants

Journal

BEHAVIOUR
Volume 148, Issue 4, Pages 405-434

Publisher

BRILL
DOI: 10.1163/000579511X568562

Keywords

numerical competence; arithmetic; animals; ants; chimpanzees; birds; communication; information theory

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-04-00536, 09-07-00005]
  2. Presidium of Russian Academy of Science [26.6]
  3. Program of cooperative investigations of SB RAS and third parties [112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We survey a variety of experimental paradigms for studying animal abilities to count, to understand numerical information and to perform simple arithmetic operations. There is a huge body of evidence that different forms and elements of quantitative judgement and numerical competence are spread across a wide range of species, both vertebrate and invertebrate. Here we pay particular attention to the display of numerical competence in ants. The reason is that most of the existing experimental schemes for studying numerical processing in animals, although often elegant, are restricted by studying subjects at the individual level, or by the use of artificial communicative systems. In contrast, the information-theoretic approach that was elaborated for studying number-related skills in ants employs their own communicative means and, thus, does not require the subjects to solve any artificial learning problems, such as learning intermediary languages, or even learning to solve multiple choice problems. Using this approach, it was discovered that members of highly social ant species possessed numerical competence. They were shown to be able to pass information about numbers and to perform simple arithmetic operations with small numbers. We suggest that applying ideas of information theory and using the natural communication systems of highly social animals can open new horizons in studying numerical cognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available