4.2 Article

Delay Discounting in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Mice: Adolescent-Limited and Life-Persistent Patterns of Impulsivity

Journal

BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages 194-201

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0022919

Keywords

impulsivity; delay discounting; development; resistance to extinction; C57BL6/6J; DBA/2J

Funding

  1. [AA012337]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impulsivity is a defining characteristic of adolescence. Compared to adults, for example, adolescents engage in higher rates of drug and alcohol experimentation, risky sexual practices, and criminal activity. Such behavior may reflect reduced sensitivity to long-term consequences of behavior during adolescence. Recently, our lab has attempted to refine mouse procedures to study developmental trends in decision making in the laboratory. In the present experiment, we examined sensitivity to delayed rewards in C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice during adolescence and adulthood using an adaptation of a 2-week delay discounting procedure developed by Adriani and Laviola (2003). During training, mice could choose between a 20- or 100 mu l drop of milk delivered after a 1-s delay. During testing. the delay to the large drop of milk was increased from 1 to 100 seconds. As the delay to the larger volume increased, preference shifted to the smaller, more immediate option. In adolescence, both strains showed similar shifts in preference. In contrast, adult B6 mice were less sensitive to increasing delays than were adult D2 mice, who continued to perform much as their adolescent counterparts. A subsequent resistance-to-extinction test ruled out the possibility that the slower change in the adult B6 mice was due to perseverative responding. The present findings suggest that B6 and D2 strains may be differentially suited to uncovering the biological mechanism of short-term and long-term patterns of impulsive behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available