4.5 Article

Modelling the Quaternary evolution of shore platforms and erosional continental shelves

Journal

EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1103-1128

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/esp.255

Keywords

model; waves; shore platforms; continental shelf; sea level; Quaternary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mathematical model was used to investigate the effect of glacially induced fluctuations in sea level on the evolution of wave-cut shore platforms and erosional continental shelves during the Quaternary. The model used two deep-water wave sets, which were used to calculate breaker height and depth, and the force of the waves at the waterline, according to the width and bottom roughness of the surf zone and the gradient of the submarine slope. The model also incorporated an erosional threshold related to the strength of the rocks, the number of hours each year in which the water level is at each intertidal elevation and the amount and persistence of the debris at the cliff foot. Most runs were made using a sea level model that consisted of 26 glacial cycles from 2 million to 0.9 million years ago, and nine, of approximately twice the amplitude and wavelength, in the last 0.9 million years. The model emphasized the dynamic association between the contemporary intertidal platform and the continental shelf. Both surfaces trend towards a state of static equilibrium under oscillating sea level conditions, when attenuated waves are unable to continue eroding the rock. If there has not been enough time to reduce the gradient of the shallower portions of the continental shelf, however, intertidal shore platforms can be in a temporary, though possibly long-lasting, state of dynamic equilibrium. The model suggests that most platforms are, at least in part, inherited from one, or in many cases more, interglacial stages when sea level was similar to today's. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available