4.7 Article

Minimally invasive surgery for solitary parathyroid adenomas in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: Role of US with supplemental CT

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 220, Issue 3, Pages 631-639

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2203000998

Keywords

parathyroid, CT; parathyroid, hyperparathyroidism; parathyroid, neoplasms; parathyroid, US

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To determine the role of ultrasonography (US) with supplemental computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who undergo minimally invasive surgery instead of conventional neck exploration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: US and CT were performed in 61 consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (part 1) to identify and localize solitary adenomas for resection by means of minimally invasive surgery and to provide a surgical road map. In part 2, involving 33 consecutive patients, CT was performed only when no solitary adenoma was identified with US or for road map information. Minimally invasive surgery was considered successful when serum calcium levels normalized and remained stable. RESULTS: In part 1, 46 definite solitary adenomas were found with US and two additional ones with CT. Minimally invasive surgery was successful in 45 patients and failed once. In part 2, US helped identify 23 solitary adenomas, and CT helped to find one. Minimally invasive surgery was successful in 22 patients and failed in two. Combined results in 94 patients demonstrated successful minimally invasive surgery in 67 (71%), with 64 of them selected with US alone (95% Cl: 61, 80). The sensitivity of US in the diagnosis of solitary adenoma was 78% (95% Cl: 67%, 86%), with a positive predictive value of 96% (95% Cl: 88%, 99%). CONCLUSION: US examination of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism allowed successful selection for minimally invasive surgery in more than two-thirds of the cases, with additional CT useful chiefly for surgical road mapping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available