4.7 Article

Plaque burden, arterial remodeling and plaque vulnerability: Determined by systemic factors?

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 718-723

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01444-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to determine whether arterial remodeling and plaque vulnerability are influenced by systemic factors. BACKGROUND Atherosclerotic luminal narrowing is caused by gradual plaque growth and arterial remodeling. In the acute phase, luminal narrowing may be accelerated by acute thrombus formation, usually precipitated by rupture of a vulnerable plaque. METHODS Femoral arteries were obtained from elderly individuals at autopsy. Pairs of atherosclerotic femoral arteries from 42 individuals were examined. The arteries were divided in 1-cm intervals. Plaque size, the mode of arterial remodeling and histopathologic characteristics of plaque vulnerability (lipid-rich core and plaque inflammation) were compared between right and left femoral arteries obtained from the same individual. A role for systemic factors was assumed if a phenomenon was equally present in both arteries. RESULTS There was concordance in average plaque size (r(2) = 0.5, p < 0.001), expansive remodeling (kappa = 0.42, p = 0.007) and occurrence of plaques containing a large lipid-rich core (kappa = 0.60, p = 0.001), but no concordance in plaque inflammation (kappa = 0.067, p = 0.61) between right and left arteries. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that not only the amount of atherosclerosis, but also arterial remodeling and lipid deposition in plaques, are influenced by systemic factors. The nonhomogeneous distribution of inflammation in atherosclerotic arteries supports the hypothesis that plaque inflammation is locally affected. (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available