4.4 Article

Reasons for higher in-hospital mortality >24 hours after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women compared with men

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages 473-477

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01721-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Women have a higher in-hospital mortality rate than men after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). To determine reasons for this, we analyzed the outcome of PTCA at our institution from 1989 to 1995 for 5,989 patients (2,101 women). Women were older than men (66.8 +/- 10.9 vs 61.0 +/- 11.2 years, respectively; p <0.0001) and more likely to have diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or a history of congestive heart failure than men. In-laboratory complications at the time of PTCA were similar for women and men. During the first 24 hours after PTCA, women were more likely than men to become hypotensive (0.33% vs 0.08%, p = 0.04) and had a higher rate of vascular injury than men (1.6% vs 0.6%, p <0.001). More than 24 hours after the procedure, women had a significantly higher mortality rate (1.2% vs 0.52%, p = 0.017), which was no longer significantly different after adjustment for age (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 1.32). Multivariate correlates of death > 24 hours after PTCA were: age, a prior history of congestive heart failure, vascular injury, and use of thrombolytic agents. Of those dying < 24 hours after the procedure, 67% of women suffered a noncardiac-related death compared with only 10% of men (p < 0.001). The noncardiac death rate was 0.8% for women and 0.05% for men. These deaths were related to renal failure, vascular complications, bleeding, hypotension, and stroke, especially hemorrhagic stroke. In conclusion, immediate procedural complications at PTCA were similar for women and men; however, mortality was higher for women > 24 hours:after PTCA and before discharge due to a higher rate of noncardiac death. (C) 2001 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available