3.8 Article

Standards of palliative care for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: results of a European survey

Journal

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 159-164

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1080/146608201753275517

Keywords

motor neuron disease; palliative care; giving the diagnosis; treatment of symptoms; nutrition; ventilation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may be viewed as a paradigmatic disease for palliative care in neurodegenerative disorders. However, standards of care for ALS are known anecdotally to differ between and even within countries. METHOD: A survey was conducted among the members of the European ALS Study Group on standards of palliative care in the clinical management of patients with ALS and their families, by means of a questionnaire of 111 questions in the following areas: giving the diagnosis, treatment of symptoms, nutrition, community services, respiratory support, and terminal care. Of 110 questionnaires sent out, 73 (66%) were completed and returned from 18 countries, including all major ALS centres in Europe. RESULTS: The main areas of consensus included: presenting the diagnosis in the presence of a relative (85%) and offering a short-term follow-up (90%), regular weight checks (82%), availability of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) (94%), and discussion of respiratory issues (90%). The main differences between centres concerned symptomatic drug treatment, availability of services, ventilation and terminal care. Art additional survey shows considerable interest by the centres in palliative care trials. CONCLUSION: Great efforts are made by the centres to offer the best possible palliative care to ALS patients. The discrepancies in the type of care offered might be resolved by adopting common standards, on the basis of available evidence and mutual consensus. Several areas of ALS patient care would benefit from controlled studies to establish an evidence base for treatment decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available