4.5 Article

Prospecting at conspecific nests and exploration in a novel environment are associated with reproductive success in the jackdaw

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 9, Pages 1341-1350

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-012-1389-1

Keywords

Corvus monedula; Jackdaw; Information use; Personality; Behavioural syndrome; Novel object; Conditional strategies

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consistent behavioural differences between individuals of the same population (personality variation) might arise if individuals follow different life-history strategies. Thus, it would be important to determine how personality variation relates to behaviours potentially associated with life-history strategies, such as those related to the use of information about the state of the environment. Little is, however, known about how personality is associated with information use and reproductive success. We tested whether wild social jackdaws, Corvus monedula, show consistent behavioural differences in their exploratory behaviour (in a novel environment in the lab and in their reaction towards a novel object in the wild) and prospecting behaviour (number of visits to conspecific nests). We furthermore examined whether these behavioural traits are linked with each other and predictors of reproductive success. Breeding jackdaws were consistent in their exploratory behaviour within, and in their prospecting behaviour between, years. Exploratory behaviour in the novel environment was correlated with the latency to approach a novel object in the wild but not with the frequency of prospecting at conspecific nests. Highly exploratory males and females and frequently prospecting males produced fewer fledglings than less exploratory individuals or less prospecting males, respectively. We discuss the importance of consistent individual differences in exploration and information sampling on individual fitness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available